A chimp photocopying his butt. Primates–is there anything they can’t do?
It just goes to show that you can’t have a Super Bowl without chimp commercial.
Wow, that Napster commercial sucked. It gets attention points by doing something different–nothing. Make me actually read what you put up there? Lame. Apple employee Josh Lewis rips the service a new one (would you expect anything else?), but he has a point.
More car commercials: The Honda Ridgeline belt buckle commercial was a bit better, but it’s still not outstanding. They’re trying to break into a tough market and they’re failing to hype the real differences between their truck and the real kings of the trucks: Dodge, Ford, Chevy. The Prius commercial was inventive, but ho-hum. There are so many better ways to sell an eco-friendly car.
And I’m not so sure if I care about Verizon’s broadband TV phone. Why would I want to watch trailers and music videos on my phone? Meh. The Olympus M-Robe (mRobe, MRobe, mrobe?) looks pretty funky and could be a nice challenge to the Photo iPod (why just hold pictures when you can take them as well?)–but what’s up with that name?
Movie commercials: Sahara looks cool (but what the heck is it about?). War of the Worlds looks crazy (but I’m sorry, I don’t think an old school Chrystler minivan would be able to escape tumbling freeway). Batman Begins looks interesting (though not as exciting as I’d expect).
What? The game’s over. That sort of got interesting.
Here’s some other Super Bowl bloggers: Timothy Goddard and USA Today (Why are they blogging exactly what’s happening on TV? Aren’t you supposed to have some commentary? Some stupid jokes? Some inane comments?).
That Cadillac commercial with the eloping couple was pretty good. Though I was wondering what the mom’s car was if it could beat the fancy-schmancy roadster.