<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observations from Reading the Harry Potter Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2008/07/25/observations-from-reading-the-harry-potter-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2008/07/25/observations-from-reading-the-harry-potter-series/</link>
	<description>Writer, editor, web geek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin D. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2008/07/25/observations-from-reading-the-harry-potter-series/comment-page-1/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin D. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevindhendricks.com/?p=2485#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>I agree Dave. Starting with Goblet of Fire I think Rowling&#039;s editors stopped editing. That&#039;s about when her page count exploded and I think her publisher decided she was too brilliant to require editing, which is kind of stupid. Who else gets away with a 700 page kids&#039; book?

I think part of the reason book 7 feels so random is because she doesn&#039;t have the same convention of the school year to mark the passage of time. And Harry, Ron and Hermione in a tent for six months is a little tedious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Dave. Starting with Goblet of Fire I think Rowling&#8217;s editors stopped editing. That&#8217;s about when her page count exploded and I think her publisher decided she was too brilliant to require editing, which is kind of stupid. Who else gets away with a 700 page kids&#8217; book?</p>
<p>I think part of the reason book 7 feels so random is because she doesn&#8217;t have the same convention of the school year to mark the passage of time. And Harry, Ron and Hermione in a tent for six months is a little tedious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2008/07/25/observations-from-reading-the-harry-potter-series/comment-page-1/#comment-3007</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevindhendricks.com/?p=2485#comment-3007</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin, 

I&#039;ve heard the last book is being split into two movies. The movies don&#039;t really do much for me, though. 

I&#039;m not a Potter hater - I agree with most of your positive thoughts on the series - but I was disappointed with the last two books. I think the 6th book suffered from being not much more than set up for the final book (I didn&#039;t think the exposition was disguised very well) and the 7th suffered greatly from bloatedness and a general lack of editing. I remember thinking as I read it that there were 100 pages that could have been removed and the book wouldn&#039;t have lost anything except some doorstop functionality. I wondered if either the book was rushed out the door (which would explain the rather high occurrence of typos in the hardcover) and/or nobody had the guts to edit Rowling&#039;s final Potter story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard the last book is being split into two movies. The movies don&#8217;t really do much for me, though. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Potter hater &#8211; I agree with most of your positive thoughts on the series &#8211; but I was disappointed with the last two books. I think the 6th book suffered from being not much more than set up for the final book (I didn&#8217;t think the exposition was disguised very well) and the 7th suffered greatly from bloatedness and a general lack of editing. I remember thinking as I read it that there were 100 pages that could have been removed and the book wouldn&#8217;t have lost anything except some doorstop functionality. I wondered if either the book was rushed out the door (which would explain the rather high occurrence of typos in the hardcover) and/or nobody had the guts to edit Rowling&#8217;s final Potter story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
