<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox vs. Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/</link>
	<description>Writer, editor, web geek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: almeda</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>almeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny -- I have kind of the reverse situation.  I&#039;ve been using Firefox almost exclusively since [and before] I got my iBook.  I just upgraded to OS X Tiger, and because, or maybe coincidentally, I&#039;ve started to get the little spinny rainbow thing while using *Firefox*, so I&#039;ve had to switch to Safari for everyday use.

Wish I could figure it out.  You&#039;re right, input text/submit butons, etc., are a lot nicer with Safari, but there are some things I just miss about Firefox.  [entering searches directly into the address bar, e.g.]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny &#8212; I have kind of the reverse situation.  I&#8217;ve been using Firefox almost exclusively since [and before] I got my iBook.  I just upgraded to OS X Tiger, and because, or maybe coincidentally, I&#8217;ve started to get the little spinny rainbow thing while using *Firefox*, so I&#8217;ve had to switch to Safari for everyday use.</p>
<p>Wish I could figure it out.  You&#8217;re right, input text/submit butons, etc., are a lot nicer with Safari, but there are some things I just miss about Firefox.  [entering searches directly into the address bar, e.g.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schdav</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>schdav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>i and b have been deprecated in favor of em and strong, as those are a little more abstracted terms as all browsers don&#039;t necessarily italicize or bold things when told to.

I tried firefox when I first got my powerbook, but got sick of it&#039;s ugliness and strange focus problems (meaning that sometimes windows wouldn&#039;t react to mouse clicks or form fields wouldn&#039;t let you click them and enter text/select something).  I heard that this is because they still use the old OS 9 style rendering engine, while safari naturally uses the new Quartz stuff. At one point there was going to be a 1.1 release for the mac that switched to the new display engine, but with the way the moz. foundation has been going, I&#039;m not sure what the current status of that is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i and b have been deprecated in favor of em and strong, as those are a little more abstracted terms as all browsers don&#8217;t necessarily italicize or bold things when told to.</p>
<p>I tried firefox when I first got my powerbook, but got sick of it&#8217;s ugliness and strange focus problems (meaning that sometimes windows wouldn&#8217;t react to mouse clicks or form fields wouldn&#8217;t let you click them and enter text/select something).  I heard that this is because they still use the old OS 9 style rendering engine, while safari naturally uses the new Quartz stuff. At one point there was going to be a 1.1 release for the mac that switched to the new display engine, but with the way the moz. foundation has been going, I&#8217;m not sure what the current status of that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindhendricks.com/2005/03/21/firefox-vs-safari/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t know anything about elegance. I&#039;ve been a Windows guy since Day 1. ha

(Well, almost, it was DOS, THEN Windows.)

And take a look at my site now. It should work fine in Firefox Mac...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t know anything about elegance. I&#8217;ve been a Windows guy since Day 1. ha</p>
<p>(Well, almost, it was DOS, THEN Windows.)</p>
<p>And take a look at my site now. It should work fine in Firefox Mac&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
